Would a President Obama let his Netroots show?

A Marc Amblinder essay (HisSpace) in The Atlantic examines the promise and pitfalls of trying to parlay online campaigning into online governing. Amblinger's thesis: Barack Obama is likely to do it because he can but leaves open the question of whether he should.

Obama clearly intends to use the Web, if he is elected president, to transform governance just as he has transformed campaigning. Notably, he has spoken of conducting "online fireside chats" as president. And when one imagines how Obama's political army, presumably intact, might be mobilized to lobby for major legislation with just a few keystrokes, it becomes possible, for a moment at least, to imagine that he might change the political culture of Washington simply by overwhelming it.

This promise of transformation hinges on meaningful transparency.

What Obama seems to promise is, at its outer limits, a participatory democracy in which the opportunities for participation have been radically expanded. He proposes creating a public, Google-like database of every federal dollar spent. He aims to post every piece of non-emergency legislation online for five days before he signs it so that Americans can comment. A White House blog--also with comments--would be a near certainty. Overseeing this new apparatus would be a chief technology officer.

As an aside, that would radically redefine the role of CTO (not that the world of three-letter acronyms needed anymore confusion). The challenge here is a not just to appear to be a participatory democracy but to actually be one.

If Obama wins, and if he can harness the Web as a unifying force once the voting is done, he could be a powerful president indeed--the kind that might even deliver on some of the audacious promises that Obama the candidate has made. But the Web, like the politics it seeks to transform, is unruly and fickle. The online networks that have turbocharged Obama's candidacy could end up hemming him in, and even stalling his agenda, as president.

Obama and the Internet have both been described by their proponents as transformational with the ability to make good on the forty year promise of open government. It is at moments like these that half measures will disappoint at a devastating scale because words such as transformation and transparency should never be seen in the same sentence as the vaguely French sounding modifier faux.